VWDB Višnjan–Washington Sky Survey
Stand-in data
STAND-IN DATA. This catalog contains 2,279 ZTF detections and 1,000,000 synthetic fixture rows — NOT Visnjan-Washington observations. Stand-in data is loaded while the VW Data Analysis Pipeline is built. Do not use these measurements for science.

Statistics

The survey's observing record, computed from survey.exposures. These are ZTF's observing statistics, not Visnjan-Washington's — the stand-in notice above applies to every plot here as much as it does to a search result, and the synthetic fixture is excluded by default because its cadence is invented (a perfectly uniform one exposure every 0.01 day), not observed.

Clump by day week month Dates all 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Band zg zi zr all Synthetic fixture excluded
Exposures
14
in 1 band (zi)
Nights observed
14
1.0 exposures per night
Baseline
87 d
Mar 14, 2019 – Jun 9, 2019
Open-shutter time
0.1 h
summed exposure time
Median depth
20.51 mag
limiting magnitude per exposure
Median airmass
1.10
secant of the zenith angle

Exposures per week

How often the survey observed, split by band. A gap is a week it didn't run, not one with nothing to see. Hover a column for its date, its total and how that total divides between bands, or click a band in the legend to drop it from the chart. Zoomed to Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019; the from and to in the address take any date, not just the whole years the chips offer.

Mar 11, 2019Apr 1, 2019Apr 22, 2019May 13, 2019Jun 3, 201920Show zgzgShow all bandsziShow zrzrWeek of Mar 11, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of Mar 18, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of Mar 25, 2019 — 2 exposures (zi)Week of Apr 8, 2019 — 2 exposures (zi)Week of Apr 15, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of Apr 29, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of May 6, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of May 13, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of May 20, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of May 27, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of Jun 3, 2019 — 2 exposures (zi)

Cumulative exposures

The same data, accumulated — flat stretches are when the survey was not running, which the bar chart above makes easy to miss among the weeks that did have data. Hover a point for the running total and what it added.

Mar 11, 2019Apr 1, 2019Apr 22, 2019May 13, 2019Jun 3, 2019217Week of Mar 11, 2019 — 1 added, 8 totalWeek of Mar 18, 2019 — 1 added, 9 totalWeek of Mar 25, 2019 — 2 added, 11 totalWeek of Apr 8, 2019 — 2 added, 13 totalWeek of Apr 15, 2019 — 1 added, 14 totalWeek of Apr 29, 2019 — 1 added, 15 totalWeek of May 6, 2019 — 1 added, 16 totalWeek of May 13, 2019 — 1 added, 17 totalWeek of May 20, 2019 — 1 added, 18 totalWeek of May 27, 2019 — 1 added, 19 totalWeek of Jun 3, 2019 — 2 added, 21 total

Exposures by filter

How the observing above divides between bands — always the whole split, whichever band is currently picked. Click a slice to show only that band in the charts above, or click the one already picked to come back to all of them.

zr — 87 exposures (55% of 158) · Show zrzg — 57 exposures (36% of 158) · Show zgzi — 14 exposures (9% of 158) · Show all bands158exposureszr — 87 exposures (55% of 158) · Show zrzr8755%zg — 57 exposures (36% of 158) · Show zgzg5736%zi — 14 exposures (9% of 158) · Show all bandszi149%

Revisits and light-curve length

How often the survey comes back to the same object, over the same bands and dates as the charts above. Grouped by ZTF's own association of the stand-in data (ztf_oid), which is the only thing linking one detection to another until phase 2 builds objects — so these describe what the stand-in catalog can support, not a VW data product. Only the 2,279 detections ZTF associated this way are counted, out of 1,002,279 sources in the catalog: a source with no association has no object identity here at all, so it is absent from these charts rather than appearing as a one-point curve. With a band picked, a gap is the time to the next detection in that band — which is the interval that matters when you fold a light curve.

Objects with a curve
6
from 30 linked detections
Typical curve length
1 points
median over those objects
Typical revisit
7 d
median gap between consecutive points
Longest baseline
86.8 d
first to last point on one object

Time between consecutive detections

The sampling, which is what sets the periods a light curve can recover: a signal shorter than the typical gap is not resolved, and one near a spike in this histogram aliases against it. Log-spaced buckets — revisits run from minutes to years. Hover a row for its share.

under 1 hour — 0 gaps (0%)under 1 hour01–6 hours — 0 gaps (0%)1–6 hours06–24 hours — 0 gaps (0%)6–24 hours01–3 days — 0 gaps (0%)1–3 days03–10 days — 18 gaps (75%)3–10 days1810–30 days — 5 gaps (21%)10–30 days51–3 months — 1 gap (4%)1–3 months13–12 months — 0 gaps (0%)3–12 months0over a year — 0 gaps (0%)over a year0

Detections per object

How long the curves are. An object with a handful of points has a position and little else — fitting a period or an orbit takes tens of points at least, so it is the bottom rows here that are worth plotting. Plot the best-sampled one (13 points).

1 point — 3 objects (50%) · list them1 point32–4 — 1 object (17%) · list it2–415–9 — 0 objects (0%)5–9010–24 — 2 objects (33%) · list them10–24225–49 — 0 objects (0%)25–49050–99 — 0 objects (0%)50–990100 or more — 0 objects (0%)100 or more0

Same data as JSON: /api/statistics?band=zi&from=2019-01-01&to=2019-12-31