VWDB Višnjan–Washington Sky Survey
Stand-in data
STAND-IN DATA. This catalog contains 2,279 ZTF detections and 1,000,000 synthetic fixture rows — NOT Visnjan-Washington observations. Stand-in data is loaded while the VW Data Analysis Pipeline is built. Do not use these measurements for science.

Statistics

The survey's observing record, computed from survey.exposures. These are ZTF's observing statistics, not Visnjan-Washington's — the stand-in notice above applies to every plot here as much as it does to a search result, and the synthetic fixture is excluded by default because its cadence is invented (a perfectly uniform one exposure every 0.01 day), not observed.

Clump by day week month Dates all 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Band g i r zg zi zr Synthetic fixture included
Exposures
158
in 3 bands (zg, zi, zr)
Nights observed
70
2.3 exposures per night
Baseline
360 d
Jan 3, 2019 – Dec 29, 2019
Open-shutter time
1.3 h
summed exposure time
Median depth
21.10 mag
limiting magnitude per exposure
Median airmass
1.11
secant of the zenith angle

Exposures per week

How often the survey observed. A gap is a week it didn't run, not one with nothing to see. Hover a column for its date, its total and how that total divides between bands. Zoomed to Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019; the from and to in the address take any date, not just the whole years the chips offer.

Dec 31, 2018Mar 30, 2019Jun 27, 2019Sep 24, 2019Dec 23, 2019170Week of Dec 31, 2018 — 4 exposures (zg 1, zr 3) · part of this week is outside the dates shownWeek of Jan 7, 2019 — 17 exposures (zg 10, zr 7)Week of Jan 14, 2019 — 2 exposures (zr)Week of Jan 21, 2019 — 1 exposure (zg)Week of Jan 28, 2019 — 3 exposures (zg 2, zr 1)Week of Feb 4, 2019 — 6 exposures (zg 3, zr 3)Week of Feb 11, 2019 — 2 exposures (zr)Week of Feb 25, 2019 — 6 exposures (zg 2, zr 4)Week of Mar 4, 2019 — 4 exposures (zg 2, zr 2)Week of Mar 11, 2019 — 5 exposures (zg 2, zi 1, zr 2)Week of Mar 18, 2019 — 2 exposures (zi 1, zr 1)Week of Mar 25, 2019 — 13 exposures (zg 5, zi 2, zr 6)Week of Apr 1, 2019 — 6 exposures (zg 3, zr 3)Week of Apr 8, 2019 — 16 exposures (zg 5, zi 2, zr 9)Week of Apr 15, 2019 — 2 exposures (zi 1, zr 1)Week of Apr 22, 2019 — 11 exposures (zg 6, zr 5)Week of Apr 29, 2019 — 6 exposures (zg 2, zi 1, zr 3)Week of May 6, 2019 — 3 exposures (zg 1, zi 1, zr 1)Week of May 13, 2019 — 1 exposure (zi)Week of May 20, 2019 — 4 exposures (zg 2, zi 1, zr 1)Week of May 27, 2019 — 9 exposures (zg 4, zi 1, zr 4)Week of Jun 3, 2019 — 10 exposures (zg 4, zi 2, zr 4)Week of Jun 17, 2019 — 1 exposure (zr)Week of Jun 24, 2019 — 3 exposures (zg 1, zr 2)Week of Jul 1, 2019 — 1 exposure (zr)Week of Jul 8, 2019 — 2 exposures (zr)Week of Oct 28, 2019 — 2 exposures (zr)Week of Nov 4, 2019 — 9 exposures (zr)Week of Nov 11, 2019 — 4 exposures (zr)Week of Dec 16, 2019 — 1 exposure (zr)Week of Dec 23, 2019 — 2 exposures (zg 1, zr 1)

Cumulative exposures

The same data, accumulated — flat stretches are when the survey was not running, which the bar chart above makes easy to miss among the weeks that did have data. Hover a point for the running total and what it added.

Dec 31, 2018Mar 30, 2019Jun 27, 2019Sep 24, 2019Dec 23, 2019270112Week of Dec 31, 2018 — 4 added, 116 total · part of this week is outside the dates shownWeek of Jan 7, 2019 — 17 added, 133 totalWeek of Jan 14, 2019 — 2 added, 135 totalWeek of Jan 21, 2019 — 1 added, 136 totalWeek of Jan 28, 2019 — 3 added, 139 totalWeek of Feb 4, 2019 — 6 added, 145 totalWeek of Feb 11, 2019 — 2 added, 147 totalWeek of Feb 25, 2019 — 6 added, 153 totalWeek of Mar 4, 2019 — 4 added, 157 totalWeek of Mar 11, 2019 — 5 added, 162 totalWeek of Mar 18, 2019 — 2 added, 164 totalWeek of Mar 25, 2019 — 13 added, 177 totalWeek of Apr 1, 2019 — 6 added, 183 totalWeek of Apr 8, 2019 — 16 added, 199 totalWeek of Apr 15, 2019 — 2 added, 201 totalWeek of Apr 22, 2019 — 11 added, 212 totalWeek of Apr 29, 2019 — 6 added, 218 totalWeek of May 6, 2019 — 3 added, 221 totalWeek of May 13, 2019 — 1 added, 222 totalWeek of May 20, 2019 — 4 added, 226 totalWeek of May 27, 2019 — 9 added, 235 totalWeek of Jun 3, 2019 — 10 added, 245 totalWeek of Jun 17, 2019 — 1 added, 246 totalWeek of Jun 24, 2019 — 3 added, 249 totalWeek of Jul 1, 2019 — 1 added, 250 totalWeek of Jul 8, 2019 — 2 added, 252 totalWeek of Oct 28, 2019 — 2 added, 254 totalWeek of Nov 4, 2019 — 9 added, 263 totalWeek of Nov 11, 2019 — 4 added, 267 totalWeek of Dec 16, 2019 — 1 added, 268 totalWeek of Dec 23, 2019 — 2 added, 270 total

Exposures by filter

How the observing above divides between bands — always the whole split, whichever band is currently picked. Click a slice to show only that band in the charts above.

zr — 87 exposures (55% of 158) · Show only zrzg — 57 exposures (36% of 158) · Show only zgzi — 14 exposures (9% of 158) · Show only zi158exposureszr — 87 exposures (55% of 158) · Show only zrzr8755%zg — 57 exposures (36% of 158) · Show only zgzg5736%zi — 14 exposures (9% of 158) · Show only zizi149%

Revisits and light-curve length

How often the survey comes back to the same object, over the same bands and dates as the charts above. Grouped by ZTF's own association of the stand-in data (ztf_oid), which is the only thing linking one detection to another until phase 2 builds objects — so these describe what the stand-in catalog can support, not a VW data product. Only the 2,279 detections ZTF associated this way are counted, out of 1,002,279 sources in the catalog: a source with no association has no object identity here at all, so it is absent from these charts rather than appearing as a one-point curve.

Objects with a curve
20
from 281 linked detections
Typical curve length
6 points
median over those objects
Typical revisit
3 d
median gap between consecutive points
Longest baseline
360.1 d
first to last point on one object

Time between consecutive detections

The sampling, which is what sets the periods a light curve can recover: a signal shorter than the typical gap is not resolved, and one near a spike in this histogram aliases against it. Log-spaced buckets — revisits run from minutes to years. Hover a row for its share.

under 1 hour — 48 gaps (18%)under 1 hour481–6 hours — 0 gaps (0%)1–6 hours06–24 hours — 23 gaps (9%)6–24 hours231–3 days — 57 gaps (22%)1–3 days573–10 days — 74 gaps (28%)3–10 days7410–30 days — 37 gaps (14%)10–30 days371–3 months — 16 gaps (6%)1–3 months163–12 months — 6 gaps (2%)3–12 months6over a year — 0 gaps (0%)over a year0

Detections per object

How long the curves are. An object with a handful of points has a position and little else — fitting a period or an orbit takes tens of points at least, so it is the bottom rows here that are worth plotting. Plot the best-sampled one (76 points).

1 point — 4 objects (20%) · list them1 point42–4 — 4 objects (20%) · list them2–445–9 — 6 objects (30%) · list them5–9610–24 — 3 objects (15%) · list them10–24325–49 — 1 object (5%) · list it25–49150–99 — 2 objects (10%) · list them50–992100 or more — 0 objects (0%)100 or more0

Same data as JSON: /api/statistics?fixture=show&from=2019-01-01&to=2019-12-31